[Icecast] Using Icecast relay function with dynamic IP at remote source end

Jack Elliott thatjackelliott at kpov.org
Thu Apr 20 23:05:11 UTC 2017


Ha! Terms even a broadcaster can understand! Many many thanks.

If BUTT is considered to be as good a transporter as Icecast, then I 
will stick with what I'm doing, if for no other reason than, "Master is 
the source server (where the source comes from) and Slave is the relay. 
THe connection is initiated by the slave to the master."

Slave may not know where the Master is. Master (on a table in front of 
me at a remote music event) may be at unknown/dynamic IP address. I'd 
have to find my IP address, Teamview into the server computer at the 
station, stop the Icecast service, edit icecast.xml with my current IP 
address, and re-start the Icecast service.

Is there any way to "push" a connection from Master to Slave? Slave is 
at a fixed IP address.

-- 
That Jack Elliott
(541) 848 7021
KPOV 88.9 FM High Desert Community radio
Producer, The Wednesday Point
Host, The Sunday Classics

On 4/19/2017 8:47 PM, David Saunders wrote:
> ok let see if I can translate it to broadcaster terms for ya :)
>
> A icecast server can be set up to accept direct source connection. ie 
> dark ice( which i do agree runs better on the  machine where icecast 
> server is. ) I do use it to trans-code the mount to different encoding.
>
> THe icecast server can also set up as a relay, where it pulls in from 
> the another server.  Primary used to pull the stream from a icecast 
> server. Then make it available to be acceded by clients from it mounts.
>
> But, BUTT is designed to stream to an icecast server, and does very well.
>
>
> http://icecast.org/docs/icecast-2.4.1/relaying.html
>
> Master is the source server (where the source comes from) ad Slave is 
> the relay. THe connection is initiated by the slave to the master.
>
> BUTT ---MASTER ========= SLAVE ===== Clients
> --- can be local host or lan or wan  private or public
>
> == is public connections wans/lans/...
>
> If you need more bandwidth you can setup/rent other SLAVEs on other 
> networks to augment you bandwidth.
>
> It lot easier to have 1 master and bunch of slaves to spreading the 
> bandwidth out,  It easier to maintain a single master with many mounts 
> + it easy to trace problems down with sources going to a common Master.
>
> I tend to diverge from your question a bit.   But, your encoder should 
> work find with broadcaster to the icecast server by itself. I have had 
> it done for the past 10 years. The only real issue s when you encode 
> the stream higher then what he bandwidth can handle.  remember the 
> source clients use the UPLOAD speed of you connection and the client 
> use the UPLOAD speeds. In the USA it no uncommon to have uploads 
> speeds to be far slower then you can download. Also I am talking about 
> how fast the connection is not how much data you have in a month. It 
> get really confusing when you talk about bandwidth, since they call 
> both bandwidths.One is how big your pipe is and other how much you get 
> through the pipe in a given time.
>
> Lot of the extra above fore those reading this and nee d a little more 
> clarity :)
> David
>
>
> SLAVE looks a the master waiting for something to do. When it sees the 
> mount it relays it.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 7:33 PM, Jack Elliott 
> <thatjackelliott at kpov.org <mailto:thatjackelliott at kpov.org>> wrote:
>
>     /I made an error, I swapped two diagrams, it should be this:/
>
>     Here's how I've been doing it:
>
>     BUTT ===> WAN ===> Icecast server
>
>     I thought I might try this instead:
>
>     BUTT --> localhost Icecast server ===> WAN ===> Icecast server
>
>     -- 
>     That Jack Elliott
>     (541) 848 7021 <tel:%28541%29%20848-7021>
>     KPOV 88.9 FM High Desert Community radio
>     Producer, The Wednesday Point
>     Host, The Sunday Classics
>
>     On 4/19/2017 4:00 PM, Jack Elliott wrote:
>>
>>     Hi David, I don't think we will necessarily be on wifi, I'm sorry
>>     if I implied that. There are a couple of events each year when we
>>     have to use wifi, but for those I have a dedicated access point
>>     running at close to 1 watt connected directly to our ISP's network.
>>
>>     Okay, I was told over on the Darkice listserv that using Darkice
>>     > WAN > Icecast is not very reliable, and my testing supported
>>     that statement. They said that Darkice is an encoder, and Icecast
>>     is a transporter. Icecast, they said, is very reliable, Darkice
>>     is a good encoder but not too great as a transporter.
>>
>>     I've been using BUTT as the encoder at the remote (audio source)
>>     end, and sending the stream over the WAN to the Icecast server at
>>     the station building. BUTT, I found, is more reliable than
>>     Darkice at the encoding end.
>>
>>     Here's how I've been doing it:
>>
>>     BUTT --> localhost Icecast server ===> WAN ===> Icecast server
>>
>>     I thought I might try this instead:
>>
>>     BUTT ===> WAN ===> Icecast server
>>
>>     Now here I want to avoid using incorrect terminology. The way I
>>     am using the word "remote" is how it is used in broadcast: if a
>>     crew leaves the building to broadcast an event occurring outside
>>     the station somewhere, they are doing a remote.
>>
>>     So in my case, the "remote" is at the music festival - my audio
>>     source.
>>
>>     So when you write, "The relay easiest to configured in a pull
>>     configuration. Where the setting are setup on the remote server."
>>     -- is it correct for me to interpret that to mean that I can
>>     leave the settings on the station computer's server alone, just
>>     set up the server in my remote kit to "pull" from the station's
>>     server?
>>
>>     I am puzzled by "pull," since I am wanting to send audio from me
>>     to the station, but that's pulling?
>>
>>     -- 
>>     That Jack Elliott
>>     (541) 848 7021 <tel:%28541%29%20848-7021>
>>     KPOV 88.9 FM High Desert Community radio
>>     Producer, The Wednesday Point
>>     Host, The Sunday Classics
>>     On 4/19/2017 10:26 AM, David Saunders wrote:
>>>     Hey,
>>>
>>>       The relay easiest to configured in a pull configuration. Where
>>>     the setting are setup on the remote server.
>>>
>>>        Since the client is on WiFi, you will have lots of issues
>>>     streaming due to the ever changing wifi environment.  My
>>>     suggestion is source the stream at the lowest settings for
>>>     encoding you can live with, This will keep the bandwidth down
>>>     and less likely burp on you.
>>>
>>>       We do have clients who use WiFi and set the the encoding to
>>>     smallest size for the content being recorded. Most of the time
>>>     since its voice content we really don't have to go super high on
>>>     the encoding.
>>>
>>>      I have set up the relay to supplement our bandwidth when we
>>>     think it will be over the limit.  Just remember you need to give
>>>     the listeners the remote server connection info not the local
>>>     server.
>>>
>>>       Why it would be better? not sure why, but if the icecast
>>>     server is set with a larger buffer, it will buffer thru the
>>>     disconnects of the source.
>>>
>>>     David.
>>>
>>>     On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Marvin Scholz
>>>     <epirat07 at gmail.com <mailto:epirat07 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>         On 19 Apr 2017, at 16:20, Jack Elliott wrote:
>>>
>>>             For our community radio station's live music festivals
>>>             broadcasts, we set up a small broadcast studio at the
>>>             festival's venue, and use B.U.T.T. to send a stream to
>>>             an Icecast server located at the radio station's building.
>>>
>>>             REMOTE LOCATION                        STATION BUILDING
>>>             B.U.T.T.         ======= WAN =======>> ICECAST SERVER
>>>
>>>             It's pretty reliable, though BUTT does sometimes lose
>>>             connection, probably due to network congestion.
>>>
>>>             The folks on the Darkice listserv claim that using
>>>             Icecast to do the sending provides a more reliable
>>>             connection. So I want to try this idea:
>>>
>>>             REMOTE LOCATION     STATION BUILDING
>>>             B.U.T.T. --> Icecast on localhost  ==== WAN ====>>
>>>             ICECAST SERVER
>>>
>>>
>>>         I am not sure how this could be more reliable than BUTT alone.
>>>
>>>
>>>             I'm finding the terminology for setting up a relay (on
>>>             http://icecast.org/docs/icecast-2.4.0/config-file.html#relay
>>>             <http://icecast.org/docs/icecast-2.4.0/config-file.html#relay>)
>>>             to be a bit confusing and could use some help.
>>>
>>>             I believe I want to set up a Specific Mountpoint Relay.
>>>             It's where the IP addresses get plugged in that I need
>>>             some clarification. The IP address for the building is
>>>             static, but the IP address for the remote server is
>>>             unknown before every festival, and may be dynamic.
>>>
>>>             The documentation says that for the <relay> section of
>>>             the xml, we have a <server>127.0.0.1</server> setting.
>>>             And that is described as "This is the IP for the server
>>>             which contains the mountpoint to be relayed."
>>>
>>>             I can't tell whether the <relay? section is on the
>>>             remote server, in which case we only need to put the
>>>             static IP of the building in the <server> section, or
>>>             whether the <relay> section is on the building's server,
>>>             in which case we need to know ahead of time what our
>>>             remote IP will be, and hope it doesn't change during the
>>>             festival.
>>>
>>>             I hope this question makes sense. My confusion is
>>>             clearly because I am unclear which server (remote or
>>>             building) the <relay> section applies to.
>>>
>>>             -- 
>>>             That Jack Elliott
>>>             (541) 848 7021 <tel:%28541%29%20848%207021>
>>>             KPOV 88.9 FM High Desert Community radio
>>>             Producer, The Wednesday Point
>>>             Host, The Sunday Classics
>>>             _______________________________________________
>>>             Icecast mailing list
>>>             Icecast at xiph.org <mailto:Icecast at xiph.org>
>>>             http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/icecast
>>>             <http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/icecast>
>>>
>>>         _______________________________________________
>>>         Icecast mailing list
>>>         Icecast at xiph.org <mailto:Icecast at xiph.org>
>>>         http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/icecast
>>>         <http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/icecast>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     Icecast mailing list
>>>     Icecast at xiph.org <mailto:Icecast at xiph.org>
>>>     http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/icecast
>>>     <http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/icecast>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Icecast mailing list
>>     Icecast at xiph.org <mailto:Icecast at xiph.org>
>>     http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/icecast
>>     <http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/icecast>
>     _______________________________________________ Icecast mailing
>     list Icecast at xiph.org <mailto:Icecast at xiph.org>
>     http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/icecast
>     <http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/icecast> 
>
> _______________________________________________
> Icecast mailing list
> Icecast at xiph.org
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/icecast
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/icecast/attachments/20170420/765375fd/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Icecast mailing list