[Icecast] Fwd: Re: Can't support more than one listener

[Eric Kolotyluk]

Just an update... I still haven't gotten around to troubleshooting why 
Icecast on my Windows 7 system doesn't support more than one listener, 
that's a mini project.

I did install the shoutcast server on my Windows 7 system and it seems 
to have no trouble supporting more than one listener.

I'll report back if I learn anything new about IceCast.

Cheers, Eric

On 11/8/2009 12:07 PM, Karl Heyes wrote:
> On 08/11/09 19:35, Eric Kolotyluk wrote:
>
>    
>> As far as I can tell, the access.log file shows no indication of
>> listener activity, at least I can see no correspondence of log lines
>> that match when the listeners appear in the error.log file. Is there a
>> way to increase the logging level in this file? Should I be able to see
>> listeners attaching in this file?
>>
>> In the error.log file I can see no indication of a two listeners
>> attempting to connect. I can see where listener-a connects, but there is
>> no indication of the listener-b attempting to connect. I can see
>> listener-a disconnect, and then I can see listener-b connect, but there
>> is no indication of listener-a trying to reconnect. It is possible that
>> after listener-a connects, Icecast is not event getting a connect
>> message from listener-b because something else is blocking it out
>> (Windows or the router)? Maybe I need to install a packet listener on my
>> system an watch the ethernet traffic?
>>      
> I would agree with that
>
>    
>> Possible problems are
>>
>> 1. My router. But I think not because the same router supports multiple
>> listeners with my old computer, and both computers are connected to the
>> same router.
>>      
> very unlikely to be the router.
>
>    
>> 2. My new computer is Windows 7 64-bit Ultimate RTM (with two ethernet
>> connections). My old computer is Windows XP (with one ethernet
>> connection). It would help if someone else could tell me if they have
>> Icecast working correctly (or not) on Windows 7.
>>      
> seeing that win7 is the new component in the chain, I would say this is
> very likely to be the cause. Probably down to the win7 firewall or TCP
> stack limiting connections, in theory a packet sniffer would still see
> the packets getting to the win7 network interface but would drop the
> connection immediately.
>
> karl.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Icecast mailing list
> Icecast at xiph.org
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/icecast
>