[Icecast] RE: Two questions

[Michael Smith]

On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 13:12:14 +0000, Dan Stowell <danstowell at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 23:43:23 +1100, Michael Smith <mlrsmith at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > If so then you're out of luck (and so am I) since ices0 is not being
> > > developed. You just have to avoid nudging it when it's on the last
> > > track...
> >
> > Whilst I don't use ices0 myself, I can tell you that that's wrong -
> > ices0 is (somewhat) actively developed, and if you reported this bug
> > (preferably using our bug reporting system at http://bugs.xiph.org),
> > I'd expect it to get fixed.
> 
> Really?
> 
> I'm sorry, I thought ices0 had been ditched/frozen since xiph had
> decided to focus on ogg and ices2. I'll report it straightaway.
> 
> Dan

Nope. The ices2 developers have, naturally enough, focussed on ices2.
ices0 isn't written by the same people - and Brendan is still
maintaining it.

Mike