[icecast] UDP Vs. TCP

[Shaun Mcmanus]

The project involves a "private" broadcast so setting up firewall rules and
forwarding would be a problem ... I'm going to post the project proposal
once I have it finished, since it is a really cool project.

-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Meuse [mailto:swave at mara.org]
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 9:19 AM
To: icecast at xiph.org
Subject: Re: [icecast] UDP Vs. TCP

<p>Shaun Mcmanus expunged (smcmanus at twcsd.com):

> I haven't touched IceCast yet, but I evaluating it for a project. On the
> website it says it uses TCP for streaming, is there an option of UDP?
> Wouldn't UDP be better for a large amount of streams? Thanks

I guess on some level it might, but using UDP for a wide audience will cause
all sorts of issues for people behind firewalls. TCP is much more friendly
to things like NAT and stateful firewalls. While it is possible to poke
holes in firewalls, and do port forwarding, it's not something you want to
do on a large scale, IMHO.

-Steve

<p><p>
--
Progress (n.):  The process through which the Internet has evolved from
smart
people in front of dumb terminals to dumb people in front of smart
terminals.
--
--- >8 ----
List archives:  http://www.xiph.org/archives/
icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'icecast-request at xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body.  No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
--- >8 ----
List archives:  http://www.xiph.org/archives/
icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'icecast-request at xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body.  No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.