darkeye at tyrell.hu
Wed Sep 19 19:44:38 UTC 2001
On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, Jack Moffitt wrote:
> > > Can I be any more trouble today? :)
> > Do yourself a favour and don't use gcc 2.96 for compiling lame. Even it
> > does compile, the generated binaries will be broken (segfault and/or
> > giving loads of bogus error messages)
> Ie, use
> CC=kgcc ./configure
Or gcc3, produces binaries with higher performance. I.e.:
CC=gcc3 ./configure --with-fileio=lame --without-vorbis --disable-gtktest
(all in one line)
--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'icecast-request at xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
More information about the Icecast