[Icecast-dev] Question about buffering with icecast protocol
Thomas B. Ruecker
dm8tbr at afthd.tu-darmstadt.de
Tue Jan 15 02:44:57 PST 2008
Karl Heyes schrieb:
> Geoff Shang wrote:
>> This raises a question I've been meaning to ask for awhile. Is there
>> any reason why we have both burst on connect and burst size?
>> Compatibility with older versions? The burst size parameter would
>> seem to be sufficient if setting it to 0 disables it.
> The burst on connect was introduced as a setting in an earlier queuing
> implementation. As you have already mentioned, it was not that
> configurable so these days it's just an alias for burst-size of 64k if
> enabled and 0 if not.
One could say then that this is deprecated? Can we drop this from the
example config in trunk so we don't confuse people?
More information about the Icecast-dev