[icecast-dev] Icecast2?

[Likai Liu]

Ricardo Galli wrote:

>By assigning a timestamp to each packet read from the source socket. I think 
>the only sane way to do it.
>
great idea. with this implementation, actually you can set a smaller 
buffer size, but wait a longer time for recovery. once congestion is 
clear, previous "missed" packets are thrown away, and new packets 
continue to flow. that introduces skips but overall latency control is 
better. i like your idea.

liulk

<p>--- >8 ----
List archives:  http://www.xiph.org/archives/
icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'icecast-dev-request at xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body.  No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.