news at likai.net
Tue Feb 19 14:09:57 PST 2002
Ricardo Galli wrote:
>By assigning a timestamp to each packet read from the source socket. I think
>the only sane way to do it.
great idea. with this implementation, actually you can set a smaller
buffer size, but wait a longer time for recovery. once congestion is
clear, previous "missed" packets are thrown away, and new packets
continue to flow. that introduces skips but overall latency control is
better. i like your idea.
<p>--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'icecast-dev-request at xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
More information about the Icecast-dev