[foms] FOMS 2013

Steve Heffernan steve at zencoder.com
Wed Jun 12 12:36:38 PDT 2013


Internet Archive sounds good to me. Would hotels be an issue at all out there? We were looking into Code for America and Heavy Bit in SoMa, and I can keep following up with them if needed.

-Steve

On Jun 12, 2013, at 12:22 PM, Tracey Jaquith <tracey at archive.org> wrote:

> thanks (and hi! 8-) Michael
> 
> Sun Nov17 + Mon Nov18
> are open here as of now.
> I'm checking a bit deeper with our staff (and I confirmed that we've had nearly 600 people upstairs (at a video showing by Rick Prelinger))
> but it seems like we'd be a good option and would be interesting in hosting/helping.
> 
> -Tracey
> 
> 
> On Jun 12, 2013, at 11:09 AM, Michael Dale <mdale at wikimedia.org> wrote:
> 
>> The Internet archive is a good space :) Is the Internet archive space 
>> available the 17-18 of November?
>> 
>> --michael
>> 
>> On 06/12/2013 01:40 PM, Tracey Jaquith wrote:
>>> I like the SF idea. 8-)
>>> 
>>> If helpful, we'd be more than happy to host it here, in SF, free, I think, as we do open-oriented 30-500 person conferences relatively regularly.
>>> Also gives a nice opportunity to get a tour of our nonprofit and combined work/terabyte-storage-system digital library space/mission.
>>> (We have converted a Christian Scientist church into an interesting space, replete with a "Great Room" that has stage, A/V system and seating
>>> for 400 or more.)
>>> 
>>> I'm sure there are plenty of other great options out there, too, but figured I'd throw us in as a suggestion.
>>> 
>>> -Tracey
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Jun 12, 2013, at 10:31 AM, Steve Heffernan <steve at zencoder.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> What would everyone think of meeting in San Francisco (the city as opposed to the valley)? We've got a few leads on meeting spaces we could use, for November 17-18.
>>>> 
>>>> -Steve
>>>> 
>>>> On Jun 6, 2013, at 3:07 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Actually, I am going to find it hard to explain that trip to my new employer.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Instead, I am wondering if I should put it between TPAC and WebRTC World:
>>>>> 
>>>>> TPAC will be 11-15 Nov (Mo-Fr) in China, http://www.w3.org/participate/meetings
>>>>> WebRTC World West will be 19-21 Nov (Tue-Thu) in Santa Clara,
>>>>> http://www.webrtcworld.com/conference/call-for-papers.aspx
>>>>> 
>>>>> We could do Sunday/Monday 17-18 Nov somewhere in the valley - if we
>>>>> get somebody to provide a meeting room.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Silvia.
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 7:05 AM, Steve Heffernan <steve at zencoder.com> wrote:
>>>>>> +1 for Paris, but the sooner it's decided the better for getting travel
>>>>>> approval and affordable tickets.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Apr 22, 2013, at 7:57 AM, Brandon Arbini <b at zencoder.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> VDD, FOMS, and IBC is a pretty strong combo for those of us from the US. I
>>>>>> thought Paris worked really well and would love to have it there again.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Brandon Arbini
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Monday, April 22, 2013 at 5:14 AM, Luca Barbato wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 4/21/13 11:58 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I've been wondering where to hold FOMS 2013. I was hoping for a
>>>>>> video-centric conference / event at the US west coast in the second half of
>>>>>> this year, but haven't come across anything yet.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Alternatively, we can hold it next to VideoLAN Developer Days in Paris
>>>>>> again.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Since US is problematic for some people that might want to be involved
>>>>>> I'd rather have it again next to the VDD in Paris.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> lu
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> foms mailing list
>>>>>> foms at lists.annodex.net
>>>>>> http://lists.annodex.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foms
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> foms mailing list
>>>>>> foms at lists.annodex.net
>>>>>> http://lists.annodex.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foms
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> foms mailing list
>>>>>> foms at lists.annodex.net
>>>>>> http://lists.annodex.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foms
>>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> foms mailing list
>>>>> foms at lists.annodex.net
>>>>> http://lists.annodex.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foms
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> foms mailing list
>>>> foms at lists.annodex.net
>>>> http://lists.annodex.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foms
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> foms mailing list
>>> foms at lists.annodex.net
>>> http://lists.annodex.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foms
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> foms mailing list
>> foms at lists.annodex.net
>> http://lists.annodex.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foms
> 
> _______________________________________________
> foms mailing list
> foms at lists.annodex.net
> http://lists.annodex.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foms

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4881 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.annodex.net/pipermail/foms/attachments/20130612/a0219ab6/attachment.bin 


More information about the foms mailing list