<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>After compiling opusenc.js to JavaScript [1], now the flac tool is also available [2][3], too.<br><br>s/Check out/Clone/ <a target="" href="https://github.com/Rillke/flac.js">https://github.com/Rillke/flac.js</a> !<br><br>I
am slightly nervous about its license, the GPL and what CloudFlare is
doing: It's melting a lot of content together into one file and adding
JavaScript that doesn't appear to be GPL or compatibly licensed -- by
any chance, is there a possibility to get an exception (e.g. LGPL
license) for JavaScript versions? It's also an issue to what happens in
proprietary browsers, or more specifically in browsers with proprietary
JavaScript VM, when they optimize code and insert custom assets. In
theory, users of them can't abide with the licensing terms and use the
tool online[5]. Advice welcome.<br><br>Another thing is the flac
website[4] being GPL licensed, too. Of course one may quote from it;
however things would be easier if it would be dual licensed, with
something, say cc-by-sa 3.0 in addition.<br><br>Finally, thanks for the great free tools, Xiph.<br><br>-- Rillke<br><br>[1] <a href="http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/opus/2014-December/002824.html" target="_blank">http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/opus/2014-December/002824.html</a><br>[2] <a target="" href="https://github.com/Rillke/flac.js">https://github.com/Rillke/flac.js</a><br>[3] <a target="" href="https://blog.rillke.com/flac.js/">https://blog.rillke.com/flac.js/</a><br>[4] <a target="" href="https://xiph.org/flac/index.html">https://xiph.org/flac/index.html</a><br>[5] <a target="" href="http://stackoverflow.com/a/1239727/2683737">http://stackoverflow.com/a/1239727/2683737</a> </div></body>
</html>