<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div>Please cc: the results from dev list back here though</div><div><br></div><div>I would run some tests on a diff platform but don't have access to my PC for a few weeks</div><div><br></div><div>Would also be interesting to see what decoding stats you get</div><div><br>On Jul 25, 2014, at 7:38 AM, Scott Brown <<a href="mailto:scottcbrown@gmail.com">scottcbrown@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div dir="ltr"><div>I will post to the dev list, sorry about that.<br><br>To give an idea, though, at flac level 8:<br><br></div><div>24/96 wav file<br></div><div>1.21: 61.05 seconds. ratio=0.690<br></div><div>1.3: 222.48 seconds. ratio=0.690<br>
</div><div><br></div><div>smaller 16/44.1 wav file<br></div><div>1.21: 14.28 seconds. ratio=0.487<br></div><div>1.3: 51.21 seconds. ratio=0.487<br><br></div>Scott<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 2:39 AM, <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dathead2@gmail.com" target="_blank">dathead2@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="auto"><div>Are you sure they didn't change the default encoding level ?</div><div><br></div><div>I would include some example timings to give a better idea of what "significantly slower" is</div><div>
<br></div><div>Wonder if you see same for 44/16 files?</div><div><div class="h5"><div><br>On Jul 25, 2014, at 2:29 AM, Martijn van Beurden <<a href="mailto:mvanb1@gmail.com" target="_blank">mvanb1@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>
Hi,<br>
<br>
You might want to report this to the flac-dev mailinglist instead of
the flac (users) list.<br>
<br>
<div>op 24-07-14 22:02, Scott Brown schreef:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div>
<div>Hello,<br>
<br>
</div>
I'm on a Mac and I'm noticing that encoding via the flac
command line is significantly slower with version 1.3.0 than
1.2.1. I'm encoding a 24/96 file to flac, both from wav and
aiff and both formats are showing the same speed decrease
when using 1.3.0.<br>
<br>
</div>
Also, 1.2.1 will not encode an aiff-c file, but 1.3.0 will. Is
this change documented anywhere?<br>
<br>
</div>
Thanks,<br>
Scott<br>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset></fieldset>
<br>
<pre>_______________________________________________
Flac mailing list
<a href="mailto:Flac@xiph.org" target="_blank">Flac@xiph.org</a>
<a href="http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac" target="_blank">http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>Flac mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:Flac@xiph.org" target="_blank">Flac@xiph.org</a></span><br>
<span><a href="http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac" target="_blank">http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac</a></span><br></div></blockquote></div></div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
Flac mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Flac@xiph.org">Flac@xiph.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac" target="_blank">http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></blockquote></body></html>