<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">2007/7/24, Ivo Emanuel Gonçalves <<a href="mailto:justivo@gmail.com">justivo@gmail.com</a>>:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On 7/24/07, Greg M. <<a href="mailto:contrabassboy@yahoo.com">contrabassboy@yahoo.com</a>> wrote:<br>> Ivo, Harry is asking about CPU usage of the DEcoder,<br>> not the ENcoder.<br><br>Sorry, my bad.<br><br>I believe that FLAC's decoding is somewhat faster than most other
<br>lossless formats, as FLAC is a much less complex format.</blockquote><div><br><br>Maybe somebody knows some comparison tables with some measured values like the ones available for encoding times?<br>(so now I'm looking for the decoding CPU power loads)
<br><br>thx<br></div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">_______________________________________________<br>Flac mailing list
<br><a href="mailto:Flac@xiph.org">Flac@xiph.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac">http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac</a><br></blockquote></div><br>