<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">2007/5/13, Ivo Emanuel Gonçalves <<a href="mailto:justivo@gmail.com">justivo@gmail.com</a>>:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On 5/13/07, Brian Willoughby <<a href="mailto:brianw@sounds.wa.com">brianw@sounds.wa.com</a>> wrote:<br>> If we ever reach this 64 GigaSample limit, the fact that FLAC is a<br>> stream should allow multiple FLAC headers to be concatenated in a
<br>> single file - although that might be tricky.<br><br>I believe you can do this with Ogg FLAC. The Ogg container manages<br>the multiple FLAC streams. Theoretically, we'll never see limit<br>issues.</blockquote>
<div><br><br>why not? :)<br>If I encode 192 kHz sound @ 24 bit for some days (WAV file) and I encode it to FLAC, I think you can have a very big file and 1.5 TB is reached very quickly.<br>And in the future audio will even get bigger, when used for HD-DVD en Blu-ray media and
5.1 channels is considered the 'minimum' setting for surround sound.<br><br>Harry<br></div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
-Ivo<br>_______________________________________________<br>Flac mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Flac@xiph.org">Flac@xiph.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac">http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac
</a><br></blockquote></div><br>