<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">2007/4/1, Ivo Emanuel Gonçalves <<a href="mailto:justivo@gmail.com">justivo@gmail.com</a>>:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
What Brian Willoughby means is that even though the future is<br>uncertain, you may trust FLAC. The format is mature enough so that<br>you won't see major changes preventing playback of files encoded by<br>older encoders, but even if that comes to happen, the playback
<br>libraries on most software will be backwards-compatible, and FLAC is<br>lossless meaning that you may convert FLAC 1.1.4 to a possible FLAC 3<br>without problems.</blockquote><div><br><br>Ok, I see. thanks for the answer
<br>Is it still possible to decode FLAC files, encoded with the very first FLAC encoder, with FLAC 1.1.4? If the answer is true (I have never tested it), then I'm pretty sure the future will bring no surprises.<br><br>
</div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Hope that helps,<br>Ivo Emanuel Gonçalves<br><br>_______________________________________________
<br>Flac mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Flac@xiph.org">Flac@xiph.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac">http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac</a><br><br></blockquote></div><br>