[Flac] flac 1.40 verses ffmpeg

[Michael D. Lawler]

The difference can either be small or from 
200-300 K.  Is adding welch to libflac a good 
idea?  Would you like access to any of the files?

At 08:17 AM 9/29/2022, Martijn van Beurden wrote:
>Op di 27 sep. 2022 om 17:10 schreef Michael D. 
>Lawler <<mailto:mdlawler at lawlers.us>mdlawler at lawlers.us>:
>These are all 44.1kHz and adding -b 4608 helped, 
>but ffmpeg still does better than flac for this handful of files.
>
>
>Then I think the remaining difference might be 
>in the apodization used by ffmpeg. I think 
>ffmpeg uses a welch window, whereas 
>libFLACÂ  uses a rather complicated arrangement 
>of brute-forcing various windows approaches, not including welch.
>
>If that is not it, I presume the file size 
>differences in these files are very small?
>Â

-- 
Michael D. Lawler
email mailto:mdlawler at lawlers.us
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac/attachments/20220929/9bbf8734/attachment.htm>