[Flac] 1.21 vs 1.3 encoding speed

[Scott Brown]

I will post to the dev list, sorry about that.

To give an idea, though, at flac level 8:

24/96 wav file
1.21: 61.05 seconds. ratio=0.690
1.3: 222.48 seconds. ratio=0.690

smaller 16/44.1 wav file
1.21: 14.28 seconds. ratio=0.487
1.3: 51.21 seconds. ratio=0.487

Scott


On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 2:39 AM, <dathead2 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Are you sure they didn't change the default encoding level ?
>
> I would include some example timings to give a better idea of what
> "significantly slower" is
>
> Wonder if you see same for 44/16 files?
>
> On Jul 25, 2014, at 2:29 AM, Martijn van Beurden <mvanb1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> You might want to report this to the flac-dev mailinglist instead of the
> flac (users) list.
>
> op 24-07-14 22:02, Scott Brown schreef:
>
>   Hello,
>
>  I'm on a Mac and I'm noticing that encoding via the flac command line is
> significantly slower with version 1.3.0 than 1.2.1. I'm encoding a 24/96
> file to flac, both from wav and aiff and both formats are showing the same
> speed decrease when using 1.3.0.
>
>  Also, 1.2.1 will not encode an aiff-c file, but 1.3.0 will. Is this
> change documented anywhere?
>
>  Thanks,
> Scott
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Flac mailing listFlac at xiph.orghttp://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Flac mailing list
> Flac at xiph.org
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Flac mailing list
> Flac at xiph.org
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac/attachments/20140725/53ff1ccf/attachment.htm