[Flac] best string setting

Rick cms0009 at gmail.com
Thu Jul 12 17:02:01 PDT 2007


Thanks, that all I need to know.
Rich

On Thursday 12 July 2007 5:14:49 pm Brad Leblanc wrote:
> Level 1 uses far less compression than level 8.  In terms of compression,
> the lower the "level" the less compression used (and the larger the
> resulting FLAC file).
>
> Hope that helps.
>
> -Brad
>
> On 7/12/07, Rick <cms0009 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I try to make it easier for you to understand,
> > I do understand about lossless format, hence I installed flac,
> > second, understanding the setting under the man pages is the key.
> > so, I pose a question, which is:
> >
> > What setting uses the least amount of compression.
> >
> > flac --best
> > or
> > flac -1
> >
> > Richard
> >
> > On Thursday 12 July 2007 11:08:44 am Alex Jones wrote:
> > > I think he might be concerned with audio quality, and doesn't quite
> > > understand what "lossless" really means!
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 07:12 -0700, Mark Rudholm wrote:
> > > > Rick wrote:
> > > > > hmm, let me ask this question, another way...
> > > > > which setting offer the least compression ?.
> > > >
> > > > Not using it at all.
> > > >
> > > > But why would you want that?  What's the goal here?
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Flac mailing list
> > > > Flac at xiph.org
> > > > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Flac mailing list
> > Flac at xiph.org
> > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac




More information about the Flac mailing list