[Flac] Re: James Chapman FLAC 1.1.2 File Filter for Cool Edit Pro 2

[Josh Coalson]

I've never used it so I don't know...

--- Didier Eggerickx <didier.eggerickx at skynet.be> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> Different how? When displaying the wave in Cool Edit (it's to say,
> the FLAC 
> file itself is opened and decoded through the Chapman filter), the
> audio 
> wave result shows little differences : changes in frequencies at a
> given 
> time, lower or higher; not many changes, but changes! I attribute
> this to 
> the filter, because when decoding with your soft, already used for
> encoding, 
> no problem at all, the two waves are exactly identical, in Cool Edit,
> and 
> with a binary comparison tool like Windiff, Dos FC, or so...no
> difference at 
> all!!
> Can you confirm this?
> 
> Didier
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: <flac-request at xiph.org>
> To: <flac at xiph.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 9:00 PM
> Subject: Flac Digest, Vol 26, Issue 7
> 
> 
> Send Flac mailing list submissions to
> flac at xiph.org
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> flac-request at xiph.org
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> flac-owner at xiph.org
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Flac digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. Re: James Chapman Flac 1.1.2 File Filter for Cool Edit Pro v2
>       (Josh Coalson)
>    2. Re: flac files (Richard)
> 
> 
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 16:22:45 -0800 (PST)
> From: Josh Coalson <xflac at yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: [Flac] James Chapman Flac 1.1.2 File Filter for Cool
> Edit
> Pro v2
> To: Didier Eggerickx <didier.eggerickx at skynet.be>, flac at xiph.org
> Message-ID: <452518.89795.qm at web60418.mail.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
> 
> --- Didier Eggerickx <didier.eggerickx at skynet.be> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Paranoïac? Maybe... When encoding my files in FLAC, and using the
> > Verify option, I do a final test with Cool Edit Pro v2.0, which
> used
> > a flac.flt file created by James Chapman for Flac v 1.1.2.
> > The problem is that, when decoding a Flac file with the Josh
> Coalson
> > soft, I obtain the same file, in content in size than the original
> > WAV file, but when opening the FLAC file in Cool Edit (using thus
> > this file filter), the result is most of the time a little
> different
> > than the WAV (original or decoded) file. I say "most of the time"
> > because in two cases, it was also exactly the same. How can you
> > explain that?
> > I have the same problem with MP3, but MP3 is lossy, and I don't
> know
> > on which version of which encoder it is based, so, in this case,
> it's
> > more understanding...
> > Thanks for your answer,
> 
> different how?  see also
> http://flac.sourceforge.net/faq.html#tools__wave_flac_wave
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
> http://new.mail.yahoo.com
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 22:06:20 -0500
> From: Richard <cms01 at tampabay.rr.com>
> Subject: Re: [Flac] flac files
> To: Mark Rudholm <rudholm at hyperreal.org>, flac at xiph.org
> Message-ID: <200611132206.20717.cms01 at tampabay.rr.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain;  charset="iso-8859-1"
> 
> simple, not everyone has a ipod of sorts...
> and some of my friends just have a cd player..
> that can play mp3 but not flac or ogg files..
> 
> 
> Rich
> 
> 
> On Monday 13 November 2006 2:27 pm, you wrote:
> > Now that that's hopefully clear, my question would be
> > "why do you want to do this?" Since CD-ROM discs aren't
> > very capacious and FLAC tends to yield only about a 2:1
> > compression ratio, it only halves the number of discs you'd
> > have to carry around. Players with internal disk or flash
> > memory can hold data equivalent to up to 100 CD-ROMs and
> > are far smaller than any CD player.
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Flac mailing list
> Flac at xiph.org
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac
> 
> 
> End of Flac Digest, Vol 26, Issue 7
> ***********************************
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Flac mailing list
> Flac at xiph.org
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac
> 



 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Sponsored Link

Don't quit your job - take classes online
www.Classesusa.com