<div dir="ltr">Well I'm not testing on music material but on a single piano note of 1 min length<div>and went from a 0.156 to a 0.148 ratio</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks for the answer.</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 7:47 PM, Martijn van Beurden <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mvanb1@gmail.com" target="_blank">mvanb1@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Op 06-02-15 om 10:03 schreef Olivier Tristan:<br>
<span class="">> Hi Guys,<br>
><br>
> Does having multiple apodization functions change something to the<br>
> decoding process<br>
> or does it only apply to the encoding process ?<br>
<br>
</span>It is only applicable to encoding, it is probably best to see it<br>
as more 'analysation passes'. I wonder how you got to 10% gain<br>
though, usually gains are more in the order or 0.1% or something<br>
like that.<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
flac-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:flac-dev@xiph.org">flac-dev@xiph.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev" target="_blank">http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:13px;float:left"><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8000001907349px">Olivier Tristan</span><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8000001907349px">Research & Development</div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8000001907349px"><a href="http://www.uvi.net" target="_blank">www.uvi.net</a></div></div></div></div></div></div>
</div>