<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
AFAIK standard FLAC already reaches suchs speeds when used with the
-0 option when used on more than one core (i.e. more than one WAV
stream at a time). For some performance figures, take a look at
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://xiph.org/flac/comparison.html">http://xiph.org/flac/comparison.html</a><br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">op 16-03-14 18:27, Nouvelle Collection
schreef:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CA+BV=GXDmqpuVqo8emeFdrstYr-HKm7mHQwcfDXEFAWcKp9yjA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>Hello,<br>
<br>
Is there some version of FLAC that allows very very fast
encoding (i.e. able to process at least 150 MB / second of
.wav input data on a standard computer : laptop computer, Core
i5/i7, Windows 7 64 bit, 8 GB RAM) ? (It's ok to have a
compression ratio which is a little bit lower than
traditionnal FLAC)<br>
<br>
I'm looking for something which is between FLAC (very good
ratio, slower than LZ4) and LZ4 (very very fast compression
: 400 MB / sec, but lower compression ratio than FLAC because
it's not dedicated to audio).<br>
<br>
</div>
Best regards.<br>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
flac-dev mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:flac-dev@xiph.org">flac-dev@xiph.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev">http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>