<div dir="ltr">Here's the patch submit message for 4GB+ windows barrier.<div><br></div><div><a href="http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail//flac-dev/2013-March/003804.html">http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail//flac-dev/2013-March/003804.html</a><br>
</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 3:00 PM, <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:flac-dev-request@xiph.org" target="_blank">flac-dev-request@xiph.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Send flac-dev mailing list submissions to<br>
<a href="mailto:flac-dev@xiph.org">flac-dev@xiph.org</a><br>
<br>
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br>
<a href="http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev" target="_blank">http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev</a><br>
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br>
<a href="mailto:flac-dev-request@xiph.org">flac-dev-request@xiph.org</a><br>
<br>
You can reach the person managing the list at<br>
<a href="mailto:flac-dev-owner@xiph.org">flac-dev-owner@xiph.org</a><br>
<br>
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br>
than "Re: Contents of flac-dev digest..."<br>
<br>Today's Topics:<br>
<br>
1. Re: (no subject) (Erik de Castro Lopo)<br>
2. Question from Argentina (Federico Miyara)<br>
<br><br>---------- Forwarded message ----------<br>From: Erik de Castro Lopo <<a href="mailto:mle%2Bla@mega-nerd.com">mle+la@mega-nerd.com</a>><br>To: <a href="mailto:flac-dev@xiph.org">flac-dev@xiph.org</a><br>Cc: <br>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 18:52:38 +1000<br>Subject: Re: [flac-dev] (no subject)<br>Janne Hyvärinen wrote:<br>
<br>
> On 10.6.2013 22:27, Marcus Johnson wrote:<br>
> > Also, shouldn't the changelog feature the 4GB windows fix? I remember<br>
> > reading about that bug fix at the start of 1.3.0, and I for one was<br>
> > incredibly excited about it.<br>
> ><br>
> > if nobody remembers it I can try to hunt down that patch on the mail list.<br>
> ><br>
><br>
> IMO it should have been mentioned and I voiced my opinion about this to<br>
> Eric on IRC before the official announcement.<br>
> At least it's mentioned in the news posting on Hydrogenaudio:<br>
> <a href="http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=101082" target="_blank">http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=101082</a><br>
<br>
If some provides the required text, I'm happy to update the changelog.<br>
<br>
Erik<br>
--<br>
----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
Erik de Castro Lopo<br>
<a href="http://www.mega-nerd.com/" target="_blank">http://www.mega-nerd.com/</a><br>
<br>
<br><br>---------- Forwarded message ----------<br>From: Federico Miyara <<a href="mailto:fmiyara@fceia.unr.edu.ar">fmiyara@fceia.unr.edu.ar</a>><br>To: <a href="mailto:flac-dev@xiph.org">flac-dev@xiph.org</a><br>Cc: <br>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 12:13:56 -0300<br>Subject: [flac-dev] Question from Argentina<br><br>
Dear Friends,<br>
<br>
I am new to this mailing list. I am with the National University of Rosario, Argentina, and I am writing a book on software-based acoustical measurements, which includes a chapter on FLAC for archival and streaming purposes from an remote embedded system including a sensor.<br>
<br>
I would like to ask why the seekpoint information in the seek table metadata block reserves 64 bit for the number of first sample in target frame and for the offset of the first byte of target frame.<br>
<br>
It seems to me a lot, since 2^64 = 1.84e+19, i.e., far more samples and bytes than can be expected in any file... ever.<br>
<br>
Thank you in advance.<br>
<br>
Best regards,<br>
<br>
Federico Miyara<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
flac-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:flac-dev@xiph.org">flac-dev@xiph.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev" target="_blank">http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>