<p><br>
On Jun 19, 2012 8:08 PM, "Dennis Brunnenmeyer" <<a href="mailto:dennisb@chronometrics.com">dennisb@chronometrics.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> Perhaps update the codec to handle 32 bit files while remaining the same otherwise?</p>
<p>32bit audio files? What are they used for?</p>
<p>James.</p>
<p>><br>
> Dennis Brunnenmeyer<br>
> FULL FIDELITY MUSIC<br>
> ________________________________<br>
><br>
> On 6/19/2012 12:00 PM, <a href="mailto:flac-dev-request@xiph.org">flac-dev-request@xiph.org</a> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> Send flac-dev mailing list submissions to<br>
>> <a href="mailto:flac-dev@xiph.org">flac-dev@xiph.org</a><br>
>><br>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br>
>> <a href="http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev">http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev</a><br>
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br>
>> <a href="mailto:flac-dev-request@xiph.org">flac-dev-request@xiph.org</a><br>
>><br>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at<br>
>> <a href="mailto:flac-dev-owner@xiph.org">flac-dev-owner@xiph.org</a><br>
>><br>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br>
>> than "Re: Contents of flac-dev digest..."<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> Today's Topics:<br>
>><br>
>> 1. Next generation WebM and FLAC (James Haigh)<br>
>> 2. Re: Next generation WebM and FLAC (Ralph Giles)<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
>><br>
>> Message: 1<br>
>> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 18:08:27 +0100<br>
>> From: James Haigh <<a href="mailto:james.r.haigh@gmail.com">james.r.haigh@gmail.com</a>><br>
>> Subject: [flac-dev] Next generation WebM and FLAC<br>
>> To: <a href="mailto:flac-dev@xiph.org">flac-dev@xiph.org</a><br>
>> Message-ID:<br>
>> <<a href="mailto:CA%2ByoODbtkXwP%2BgMw8MRN_LWbgxkDFDkGXP_BT1WV57hGH9sQnw@mail.gmail.com">CA+yoODbtkXwP+gMw8MRN_LWbgxkDFDkGXP_BT1WV57hGH9sQnw@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>
>><br>
>> Hello,<br>
>><br>
>> I have proposed to WebM to use FLAC in a future version. Since FLAC was<br>
>> designed a decade ago, I was wondering if there were any new compression<br>
>> techniques that FLAC could use in a new version to improve compression<br>
>> ratios.<br>
>><br>
>> If so, it would be worth synchronising with WebM for compatibility reasons.<br>
>><br>
>> Here's the WebM discussion:<br>
>><br>
>> <a href="https://groups.google.com/a/webmproject.org/group/webm-discuss/browse_thread/thread/42fd53c71b2bcc74">https://groups.google.com/a/webmproject.org/group/webm-discuss/browse_thread/thread/42fd53c71b2bcc74</a><br>
>><br>
>> Best regards,<br>
>> James Haigh.<br>
>> -------------- next part --------------<br>
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
>> URL: <a href="http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/attachments/20120619/a226dda6/attachment.html">http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/attachments/20120619/a226dda6/attachment.html</a> <br>
>><br>
>> ------------------------------<br>
>><br>
>> Message: 2<br>
>> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 10:18:51 -0700<br>
>> From: Ralph Giles <<a href="mailto:giles@thaumas.net">giles@thaumas.net</a>><br>
>> Subject: Re: [flac-dev] Next generation WebM and FLAC<br>
>> To: James Haigh <<a href="mailto:james.r.haigh@gmail.com">james.r.haigh@gmail.com</a>><br>
>> Cc: <a href="mailto:flac-dev@xiph.org">flac-dev@xiph.org</a><br>
>> Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:4FE0B47B.10400@thaumas.net">4FE0B47B.10400@thaumas.net</a>><br>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1<br>
>><br>
>> On 12-06-19 10:08 AM, James Haigh wrote:<br>
>><br>
>>> I have proposed to WebM to use FLAC in a future version. Since FLAC was<br>
>>> designed a decade ago, I was wondering if there were any new compression<br>
>>> techniques that FLAC could use in a new version to improve compression<br>
>>> ratios.<br>
>><br>
>> The short answer is yes, but for it to be work promoting a new standard,<br>
>> you really want to do *significantly* better than flac, like lossless at<br>
>> half the file size. That's a lot harder than an extra 10% or 20%<br>
>> compression. A great research project, in other words, but I think we'd<br>
>> do better to concentrate resources on improving support for the existing<br>
>> flac format which is very widely adopted.<br>
>><br>
>> -r<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> ------------------------------<br>
>><br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> flac-dev mailing list<br>
>> <a href="mailto:flac-dev@xiph.org">flac-dev@xiph.org</a><br>
>> <a href="http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev">http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev</a><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> End of flac-dev Digest, Vol 91, Issue 4<br>
>> ***************************************<br>
>><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> flac-dev mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:flac-dev@xiph.org">flac-dev@xiph.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev">http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev</a><br>
><br>
</p>