[flac-dev] 64-bit residuals
mlichvar at redhat.com
Wed Mar 30 09:03:03 UTC 2022
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 04:57:10PM +0200, Martijn van Beurden wrote:
> Op di 29 mrt. 2022 om 11:43 schreef Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar at redhat.com>:
> > The third option makes most sense to me. I don't think we should
> > complicate decoders by requiring them to support 64-bit residuals only
> > because it's technically possible to encode such a stream.
> Would you argue this limitation is imposed on all possible FLAC
> streams, or just for PCM inputs with a bit depth up to and including
> 24? Or should this also apply to 32-bit streams?
I think that should apply only to <=24 bits. If I understand it
correctly, with 32 bits it would be a real limitation, not hit only
with specifically crafted encodings.
> A similar problem in the spec represents itself with 32-bit PCM
> inputs. When applying stereo decorrelation, a transformation to side a
> subframe bps of 33, which is very inconvenient. Should stereo
> decorrelation be forbidden for 32 bps inputs?
No, that doesn't seem acceptable to me.
> While these distinctions might seem unimportant and 32-bit streams
> folly, there is currently an effort underway to make FLAC and IETF RFC
> standard. I think that the decoder of the reference implementation
> (libFLAC) should support all features the format has before the
> standard becomes final. As the FLAC format has always supported 32 bps
> streams but no encoder for these exists, I think this requires some
> extra care.
The intended status of the current FLAC draft is informational, so
there doesn't have to be any existing implementation that supports all
bit depths, right?
More information about the flac-dev