[flac-dev] [Cellar] FLAC Markdown
Federico Miyara
fmiyara at fceia.unr.edu.ar
Tue Jun 6 21:15:54 UTC 2017
Andrew,
I think it is neither Rice Coding nor Exponential Golomb Coding. The one
used in FLAC is Golomb-Rice coding, which is almost optimal for the
Laplace (exponential) statistical distribution of residuals after modelling.
Best regards,
Federico
On 06/06/2017 0:52, Andrew James Weaver wrote:
> Hello all!
> (cc-ing the flac-dev list)
>
> I would like to give an update as to the recent CELLAR work on the
> FLAC specification.
>
> • Work has been done to make internal and external links more accurate
> and reliable.
> • 'Rice Coding' has been clarified as 'Exponential Golomb Coding.'
> • Clarifications have been made for binary representation.
> • Typos and other small changes have been fixed for clarity.
>
> Lastly, a version 00 release has been made (available at
> https://github.com/privatezero/flac_markdown/releases) and the draft
> document has been uploaded to the IETF datatracker
> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-xiph-cellar-flac/)
>
> All the best!
> Andrew Weaver
>
> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Dave Rice <dave at dericed.com
> <mailto:dave at dericed.com>> wrote:
>
>
>> On May 12, 2017, at 1:05 PM, Dave Rice <dave at dericed.com
>> <mailto:dave at dericed.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>> And cc'ing flac-dev.
>>
>>> On May 10, 2017, at 12:15 PM, Dave Rice <dave at dericed.com
>>> <mailto:dave at dericed.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Andrew,
>>>
>>>> On May 10, 2017, at 11:19 AM, Andrew James Weaver <weevz at uw.edu
>>>> <mailto:weevz at uw.edu>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello all!
>>>>
>>>> In a previous discussions on this list about people interested
>>>> in working on the FLAC standard, I said that I would be willing
>>>> to start the process of converting the existing standard into
>>>> Markdown. I am writing to inform the list that I have begun
>>>> preliminary work on this conversion.
>>>>
>>>> Currently that work is living
>>>> herehttps://github.com/privatezero/flac_markdown
>>>> <https://github.com/privatezero/flac_markdown>.
>>>
>>> I sent a pull request at
>>> https://github.com/privatezero/flac_markdown/pull/1
>>> <https://github.com/privatezero/flac_markdown/pull/1>, which
>>> starts to add a process to convert the markdown to the RFC
>>> format using the same Makefile approach that we use with the
>>> FFV1 and EBML markdown files. There's still a lot of
>>> inter-document cross-referencing that needs to be adjusted
>>> before the Makefile works. For instance current
>>> cross-referencing like:
>>>
>>> [*SUBFRAME\_VERBATIM*](#subframe_verbatim)
>>>
>>> won't render as expected in a plain text RFC, but would simply
>>> render to something like "Section X.X.X".
>>>
>>> In EBML we use markdown such as
>>> See [the section on `Element Data Size`](#element-data-size) for rules that apply to elements of unknown length.
>>> so that in the RFC this renders to
>>> See Section 7 for rules that apply to elements of unknown length.
>>> and in the markdown it renders to
>>>
>>> Seethe section on|Element Data Size|
>>> <https://github.com/Matroska-Org/ebml-specification/blob/master/specification.markdown#element-data-size>for
>>> rules that apply to elements of unknown length.
>>
>> I added some issues to the flac_markdown repository and Andrew
>> addressed them
>> inhttps://github.com/privatezero/flac_markdown/pull/7
>> <https://github.com/privatezero/flac_markdown/pull/7>. Most of
>> these issues pertain to unintended semantic differences between
>> the FLAC specification as it exists in its original HTML form at
>> https://xiph.org/flac/format.html
>> <https://xiph.org/flac/format.html>and the markdown rendition
>> being worked on at
>> https://github.com/privatezero/flac_markdown/blob/master/flac.md
>> <https://github.com/privatezero/flac_markdown/blob/master/flac.md>.
>>
>> Since the recent work focuses on a change of format from HTML to
>> markdown, I suggest that short term goals on the flac
>> specification focus on:
>> - verifying semantic equalness with the html version
>> - resolving issues that block the mmark/xml2rfc process that
>> generates the RFC formats of the specification
>> - add standard RFC boilerplate (abstract, rfc2119, etc)
>
> To summarize recent work on the FLAC specification, the document
> has been adjusted in its new markdown format in order to achieve
> semantic similarity to the original HTML rendition on the xiph.org
> <http://xiph.org> site. In order to get the structural data (such
> as the tables at the end of https://xiph.org/flac/format.html
> <https://xiph.org/flac/format.html>) to fit in plain text RFC
> style, the tables were dissected a bit to separate value lists
> from structural lists. In this way the subcomponents and defined
> in their own sections instead of the prior strategy of detailing
> lists and pseudocode within large tables. For instance see the
> original rendition of the frame header documentation from
> https://xiph.org/flac/format.html#frame_header
> <https://xiph.org/flac/format.html#frame_header> compared to the
> dissected version which gives the subcomponents their own
> subsequent sections at
> https://github.com/privatezero/flac_markdown/blob/7a5c21d49d1fda89609ffa9edfca2447c7ca3c5e/flac.md#frame_header
> <https://github.com/privatezero/flac_markdown/blob/7a5c21d49d1fda89609ffa9edfca2447c7ca3c5e/flac.md#frame_header>.
> Splitting out the subcomponents into their own sections also gives
> space to be more explicate in defining them, such as
> https://github.com/privatezero/flac_markdown/commit/3aaa5f293102018bd7c41409e79e36f510557d96
> <https://github.com/privatezero/flac_markdown/commit/3aaa5f293102018bd7c41409e79e36f510557d96>.
>
> Andrew noticed that there are some issues with managing section
> titles that contain underscores and getting internal sectional
> citations to work. For instance (#frame-header) will link to
> `FRAME HEADER` (space) but not `FRAME_HEADER` (underscore). Is
> there any reason not to swap the all-caps, underscored component
> names to tilde-quoted, all caps name with spaces rather than
> underscores?
>
> For convenience, here is a rendering of the plain text RFC output
> of git-master of the FLAC format repository:
> https://gist.github.com/dericed/2639d0eed5e064b4dec1399bc8716833
> <https://gist.github.com/dericed/2639d0eed5e064b4dec1399bc8716833>.
>
> I suggest reviews of the current markdown from those familiar with
> the historical FLAC format specification so that we ensure that
> the current work is the same in meaning to the original html
> version of the specification.
>
> Best Regards,
> Dave Rice
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cellar mailing list
> Cellar at ietf.org <mailto:Cellar at ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cellar
> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cellar>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Andrew Weaver, MLIS
> American Archive of Public Broadcasting
> National Digital Stewardship Resident @ CUNY TV
> weevz at uw.edu <mailto:weevz at uw.edu>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> flac-dev mailing list
> flac-dev at xiph.org
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/attachments/20170606/f37017ad/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the flac-dev
mailing list