[flac-dev] Do we need a pre-release?

[Erik de Castro Lopo]

Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:

> > I'd say let's have a release candidate. More often than not, some
> > issues turn up due to the exposure to a larger user base and, hence,
> > test cases.
> 
> Ok, coming up.

Unfortunately I've lost/forgotten my Xiph SVN password. While I get
that sorted out for the real release, the pre-releases are here:

    http://mega-nerd.com/tmp/flac-1.3.2pre1-win.zip
    http://mega-nerd.com/tmp/flac-1.3.2pre1.tar.xz

Md5sums are:

    3ba068ddba9b2e4fc7c140781a6c396b  flac-1.3.2pre1.tar.xz
    d9811e11af9b4ff411a7b2e834b32c6c  flac-1.3.2pre1-win.zip

Sha256sums are:

    f110314e3425611ef6350a1617c889527d16f81fccb08ef179dd4717c0eadb9c  flac-1.3.2pre1.tar.xz
    313088212c3f1b1277b58e95c9b473d981af20c082ab229596a9258129cd64a3  flac-1.3.2pre1-win.zip

This code is built from commit 368491055f8b5590893dea454f88008e551f0c03
plus another commmit to change the version number which I will
not be pushing to the public repo before the final release.

Note that these files encoeded with these pre-releases will be
4 bytes longer than the the file encoded with the 1.3.2 final
release because the version string is "1.3.2pre1" instead of
"1.3.2".

Cheers,
Erik
-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Erik de Castro Lopo
http://www.mega-nerd.com/