[flac-dev] FLAC 1.2.1b versus 1.3.0: file size differences at level -8 (best)?

rappard at dds.nl rappard at dds.nl
Fri Sep 12 04:13:58 PDT 2014

Answering my own question:

> I thought this had been answered before, but cannot find confirmation:
> if I recall correctly there's hardly any advantage (if any) to
> re-encoding from 1.2.1b to 1.3.0 at the highest compression level
> (8/best), right?
The following post (and subsequent replies, obviously) seems to
indicate that I can just stick with 1.2.1b:

Apologies for the waste of bandwidth,


More information about the flac-dev mailing list