[flac-dev] awk vs. mawk
Jan Stary
hans at stare.cz
Thu Dec 11 03:26:30 PST 2014
On Dec 11 00:40:09, mle+la at mega-nerd.com wrote:
> Jan Stary wrote:
>
> > gawk 4.0.1 and 4.1.1 works for me too.
> >
> > Erik, do you please remember what exactly happened here:
> > https://git.xiph.org/?p=flac.git;a=commit;h=5797009fa2beb0426d74485e7624775e2e58e1d1
> >
>
> Unfortunately I don't remember.
>
> > Does gawk >= 4.0.1 still fail for you?
>
> My machine now has awk being a symlink to gawk version 4.1.1
> which fails:
Hm, gawk 4.1.1 works for me on Debian. Let me look closer.
Do you have other *AWKs on the machine that you could test with, please?
This is all the more reason to get rid of the AWK script in the first place.
> > (cd test ; ./test_replaygain.sh)
> Generating stream...
>
> flac 1.3.1
> Copyright (C) 2000-2009 Josh Coalson, 2011-2014 Xiph.Org Foundation
> flac comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. This is free software, and you are
> welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions. Type `flac' for details.
>
> 80000+0 records in
> 156+1 records out
> 80000 bytes (80 kB) copied, 0.104537 s, 765 kB/s
> -: Verify OK, wrote 9004 bytes, ratio=0.112
> Testing FLAC replaygain 8000 (8000 x 1) ... -: ERROR: got partial sample
>
> Erik
> --
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Erik de Castro Lopo
> http://www.mega-nerd.com/
> _______________________________________________
> flac-dev mailing list
> flac-dev at xiph.org
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
More information about the flac-dev
mailing list