[flac-dev] awk vs. mawk

Jan Stary hans at stare.cz
Thu Dec 11 03:26:30 PST 2014


On Dec 11 00:40:09, mle+la at mega-nerd.com wrote:
> Jan Stary wrote:
> 
> > gawk 4.0.1 and 4.1.1 works for me too.
> >
> > Erik, do you please remember what exactly happened here:
> > https://git.xiph.org/?p=flac.git;a=commit;h=5797009fa2beb0426d74485e7624775e2e58e1d1
> >
> 
> Unfortunately I don't remember.
> 
> > Does gawk >= 4.0.1 still fail for you?
> 
> My machine now has awk being a symlink to gawk version 4.1.1
> which fails:

Hm, gawk 4.1.1 works for me on Debian. Let me look closer.
Do you have other *AWKs on the machine that you could test with, please?

This is all the more reason to get rid of the AWK script in the first place.

>     > (cd test ; ./test_replaygain.sh)
>     Generating stream...
> 
>     flac 1.3.1
>     Copyright (C) 2000-2009  Josh Coalson, 2011-2014  Xiph.Org Foundation
>     flac comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY.  This is free software, and you are
>     welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions.  Type `flac' for details.
> 
>     80000+0 records in
>     156+1 records out
>     80000 bytes (80 kB) copied, 0.104537 s, 765 kB/s
>     -: Verify OK, wrote 9004 bytes, ratio=0.112
>     Testing FLAC replaygain 8000 (8000 x 1) ... -: ERROR: got partial sample
> 
> Erik
> -- 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Erik de Castro Lopo
> http://www.mega-nerd.com/
> _______________________________________________
> flac-dev mailing list
> flac-dev at xiph.org
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev


More information about the flac-dev mailing list