[flac-dev] Define 6.1 and 7.1 channel mappings

[Erik de Castro Lopo]

Tim W. wrote:

> I'm personally in favor of mapping (1) as it doesn't vary between 6.1/7.1,
> and is fully compatible with the WAVEFORMATEXTENSIBLE specification.

I'm in favour of Tims proposal and intent to apply Ralph's patch
to implement this unless someone comes up with a really good reason
not to.

Erik
-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Erik de Castro Lopo
http://www.mega-nerd.com/