[flac-dev] (no subject)

[Olav Sunde]

At 16:26 06.02.2012, you wrote:


>On 06.02.2012 18:52, Olav Sunde wrote:
>> At 14:16 06.02.2012, you wrote:
>> 
>>> Olav,
>>> 
>>> A change like this could easily break the format.  That would be
>>> a bad choice.
>> 
>> That makes sense. Explains why it is not there today.
>> 
>> 
>>> On the other hand, an informational 'application' block could be
>>> added in a way that does not break the format, and this would
>>> even be backwards compatible since 'application' blocks have
>>> always been a part of the specification.  You simply won't be
>>> able to rely on them being there.
>> 
>> This is probably the best thing then. Adding the info will be
>> optional? It would certainly be an improvement and hopefully become
>> part of the command line description so users would know how to do
>> it.
>> 
>Make a specification for storing this kind of data in app-block, then
>devise a way to measure encoding complexity of existing FLAC stream -
>and you'll be able to put these block in FLAC files that didn't have
>them originally.

This would be really useful. I hope someone will try to do this for the next release of flac.

Olav

>_______________________________________________
>flac-dev mailing list
>flac-dev at xiph.org
>http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/attachments/20120207/06df756b/attachment.htm