[Flac-dev] Serious bug in FLAC
Joshua Haberman
jhaberman at ups.edu
Fri Mar 15 20:30:02 PST 2002
* Nick Lamb (njl98r at ecs.soton.ac.uk) wrote:
> 4. I found that the SEEKTABLE for my .flac looks like this:
>
> sample_number: 0 stream_offset: 0 frame_samples: 0
> sample_number: 110592 stream_offset: 0 frame_samples: 0
> sample_number: 221184 stream_offset: 0 frame_samples: 0
> sample_number: 331776 stream_offset: 0 frame_samples: 0
> sample_number: 442368 stream_offset: 0 frame_samples: 0
> sample_number: 552960 stream_offset: 0 frame_samples: 0
> sample_number: 663552 stream_offset: 0 frame_samples: 0
> sample_number: 778752 stream_offset: 0 frame_samples: 0
>
> etc.
>
> 5. I found that the command line app "flac" causes this by never
> actually writing the seektable data. It writes an empty seektable
> and then never fills it in. I tested with flac 1.0.2 on Red Hat
> Linux 7.2 with various ordinary upgrades. This has been broken for
> many months AFAICT.
>
> Does it only do this for me? Josh, can you reproduce this?
I know I'm not the Josh you were addressing, but I can't reproduce this
problem, using 1.0.2 on Debian:
point 0: sample_number=0, stream_offset=0, frame_samples=4608
point 1: sample_number=41472, stream_offset=89899, frame_samples=4608
point 2: sample_number=82944, stream_offset=176858, frame_samples=4608
This may be a silly question, but you're not piping the decoder output,
are you?
Joshua
--
Joshua Haberman <joshua at haberman.com>
More information about the Flac-dev
mailing list