[Flac-dev] command-line: AIFF writer advice

[David Collett]

How about the opposite?
What I would like to see is FLAC support in libaudiofile, so
applications written with libaudiofile could transparently take
advantage on FLAC's compression. Ironically I guess it would still make
sense to use libaudiofile in FLAC for getting input. Mmmm, cyclic
dependancies...
Or is that just a stupid idea?

Dave

On Wed, 2002-07-31 at 13:10, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 09:04:38PM -0500, Brady Patterson wrote:
> 
> > The patch I submitted only reads AIFF files.  I'm about to start the patch to
> > write AIFF files.
> > 
> > To do so, we need a command-line option to specify AIFF.  My inclination is to
> > add an option:
> > 
> >   -ff { raw | wav | aif }
> > 
> > In some sense, "-ff" is silly since it probably stands for "format format".
> > Still, I think it's better than just "-f", since the first "f" specifies the
> > entire format option group.
> > 
> > Does this seem reasonable?
> > 
> > Initially, the default will still always be wav.  OSX users are likely to want
> > AIFF as the default, though, so eventually I'll add a configuration option to
> > set the default format for decompression.
> 
> A more flexible approach might be to use libaudiofile or a similar facility,
> so that multiple input formats can be automatically recognized, and future
> formats supported in a generalized way.
> 
> I have meant to write this support for some time, but have not had the
> opportunity.  It would also be nice to have a simple command-line player
> using libao (a la ogg123).
> 
> -- 
>  - mdz
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by: Dice - The leading online job board
> for high-tech professionals. Search and apply for tech jobs today!
> http://seeker.dice.com/seeker.epl?rel_code=31
> _______________________________________________
> Flac-dev mailing list
> Flac-dev at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flac-dev
>