[Flac-dev] Re: beta 10 candidate checked in

Josh Coalson xflac at yahoo.com
Wed May 30 16:39:20 PDT 2001


--- Christian Weisgerber <naddy at mips.inka.de> wrote:
> Josh Coalson <xflac at yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> > I have checked in all the latest into CVS and am going to start the
> > test suite again.  if all goes well I will probably release this as
> > beta 10.
> 
> What's the sequence of steps required to turn this into a buildable
> distribution?
> 
(except for the other problems you mention below) the sequence I use
is:
	$ aclocal && autoconf && automake -c -a -i
and when I'm ready to build:
	$ ./configure [options]

> | # nasm build rule:
> | %.lo: %.s
> 
> Do we officially depend on GNU make now?
> You could express this portably with something like this:
> 
>     .SUFFIXES: .lo .s
>     .s.lo:
>     	...
> 
> |         $(NASM) -f elf -d ELF $< -o $@
> 
> This won't fly on OpenBSD/i386, which is a.out.
> 
yeah, my preferences are showing through... I'm not familiar with
OpenBSD.  the only boxes I have are Linux, Solaris, and Win32.
nasm.h does the right thing for a.out formats but the Makefile.am
is not flexible enough.

also, there is no intention to make it build only on gnu make, it's
just that since that's all I use, I don't catch the things you
mentioned.

the patches should be minor but I don't think I could guess it
all correctly without a system to test it on.  can you submit
such a patch?  it would be much appreciated.

Josh


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 
a year!  http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/




More information about the Flac-dev mailing list