[Flac-dev] Re: beta 10 candidate checked in
Josh Coalson
xflac at yahoo.com
Mon Jun 4 18:01:53 PDT 2001
> > | # nasm build rule:
> > | %.lo: %.s
>
> Even with gmake, this really works only by accident. Automake
> generates a competing suffix rule, and gmake apparently gives the
> rule above a higher priority than the suffix rule (or that just
> happens to be the evaluation order).
>
but when I do automake the competing build rule is nestled with
others and looks like:
.c.lo:
$(LIBTOOL) --mode=compile $(COMPILE) -c $<
.s.lo:
$(LIBTOOL) --mode=compile $(COMPILE) -c $<
.S.lo:
$(LIBTOOL) --mode=compile $(COMPILE) -c $<
it doesn't look like there's a provision for compiling .s files
with a different program than .c files, or even different flags.
so now I have no idea how to make this work as we would like.
Josh
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
More information about the Flac-dev
mailing list