[annodex-dev] captioning and cmml
Brendan Mein
bemein at gmail.com
Mon Dec 10 18:40:18 PST 2007
Please remove me from this emial group.
Thanks,
On 12/11/07, Conrad Parker <conrad at metadecks.org> wrote:
>
> On 10/12/2007, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > CMML doesn't "do" any embedding itself. The software that merges CMML
> > into the Ogg bitstream would be the place to make the selection,
> > should there be a need for selection. So, for example, say you have a
> > CMML document on a Web server that has several tracks of annotations,
> > one in english one in german and one in french. One connection is made
> > and the client requests to only receive the German track (I'm not sure
> > yet how - possibly through http parameters).
>
> Through the HTTP Accept-Language request header, just like for web pages:
> http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec14.html section 14.4
>
> > Then the server would
> > know to only multiplex the german annotation track into the file and
> > transfer that across rather than the whole lot. Such selection is not
> > to be made by the CMML document itself - it can only contain
> > information on the type of data it has and thus provide hooks for
> > selection.
> > ...
> > So, the original idea went along the following lines: a client would
> > receive all annotation tracks and provide a menu for the user to
> > select which annotation track he/she would like to view. This could
> > e.g. be a browser setting where there is a default selection (e.g.
> > German for my browser :).
>
> The normal HTTP language negotiation method is probably more
> appropriate -- ie. you set your preferred languages in your browser
> (as many languages as you like, in order of preference), and the
> browser puts these into the Accept-Language request header. It is up
> to the server to then provide the most preferred out of the content it
> has available.
>
> > The description of what annotation tracks are inside a file could be
> > transferred by the server in the file headers or some other way - we
> > haven't really described that yet. It could indeed go into the stream
> > tag and then be encapsulated at the beginning of the Ogg file. If you
> > have concrete ideas, feel free to start a specification and add a
> > patch to the cmml spec - we should indeed discuss and solve such
> > topics.
>
> The primary content language is given by the server in the HTTP
> Content-Language response header. (Specified in RFC2616 for HTTP/1.1).
>
> For a file containing multiple Ogg logical bitstreams of CMML, each
> can have its own Content-Language specified in its Ogg Skeleton
> header. The same mechanism can be used for multiple-language audio
> tracks; it is up to the server to provide the CMML and audio tracks
> matching the user's language preference. (Should be specified in the
> ogg-skeleton I-D if we haven't already :-).
>
> Within CMML content, I'm not really sure what the deal is but you
> hinted that the xml:lang attribute may be used in any element :-)
>
> cheers,
>
> Conrad.
> _______________________________________________
> annodex-dev mailing list
> annodex-dev at lists.annodex.net
> http://lists.annodex.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/annodex-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/annodex-dev/attachments/20071211/be5e55e0/attachment.html
More information about the annodex-dev
mailing list