[Advocacy] persuading mobile phone manufacturers to implement
Vorbis support
Tor-Einar Jarnbjo
tor-einar at jarnbjo.name
Sun Jun 17 04:49:25 PDT 2007
Alexander van Loon schrieb:
> Are they collaborating with Xiph.org, or are they doing this
> independently?
I really hope that Xiph doesn't have anything to do with this. Trying to
bring people to use Vorbis instead of MP3 by bashing on MP3, partly with
invalid statements (you don't have to pay licensing fees for giving away
MP3 files) instead of promoting the advantages of Vorbis or scaring them
from using MP3 by pointing out unclear licensing and patenting issues
doesn't seem like a good idea to me. What happened to Microsoft as
someone showed up and claimed that Microsoft violates one of their
patents by using MP3 technology can just as well happen to someone using
Vorbis and as soon as there is real money to get from companies using
Vorbis, I bet someone will. Actually, I am rather surprised that noone
yet has. After all, Vorbis is "under the hood" not _that_ different from
MP3 and many people seem to expect the MP3 patents to just cover the
bitstream format and not the actual technologies being used. I am well
aware that Xiph has done a patent research and has come to the result
that Vorbis doesn't violate any patents, but even if I just have very
good technical knowledge about MP3 and Vorbis and not much legal
knowledge, it is hard to ignore that several of Thomson's patents
describe technologies very similar, if not completely identical to the
technologies used by Vorbis. One example is Thomson's patents on a
"method for transmitting a signal using adaptive window functions"
(EP0414838/US5,214,742 and EP0464534/US5,321,729) from 1990/1991.
Tor
More information about the Advocacy
mailing list